Professional and Business Ethics. Choose 5 DIFFERENT CASE STUDIES. You are to analyze ALL 5 of the case studies using ONLY ONE of the following ethical theories: Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism, Nozick’s theory, virtue ethics, Rawls’ theory, or Marxism.

1. Choose 5 DIFFERENT CASE STUDIES (these can be those we discuss or those we don’t; as long as they are from the TEXT, any case study will work). 2. You are to analyze ALL 5 of the case studies using ONLY ONE of the following ethical theories: Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism, Nozick’s theory, virtue ethics, Rawls’ theory, or Marxism. 3. Make sure you provide a paragraph that accurately describes the theory you will be using. 4. Make sure you describe the case study before you apply the theory. 5. Provide a general assessment of the paper. 6. Avoid using phrases like: “In my opinion,” “I believe,” “Ethics is difficult and not certain, so it is hard to tell if this ethical theory is right or not.” This is an ETHICS course, so don’t do or say anything in your ETHICS PAPER that would undermine ethics as a discipline. Further, you are making an ARGUMENT in this paper, as such, there is no room for “personal opinions” or “feelings.” Just turn those opinions and feelings into statements of fact. 7. This paper should be no less than 8 full pages and no more than 10. This paper should be well written, typed, doubled spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman (Or equivalent font). No cover sheet is needed. Include proper citation.[supanova_question]

answer the following fully: 1. What are the logical fallacies? How is a logical fallacy different from a good argument? Essay

answer the following fully: 1. What are the logical fallacies? How is a logical fallacy different from a good argument? How can a fallacy be persuasive even if it is not logically good? 2. Name one of the most difficult logical fallacies you have encountered in this lecture. Explain why it feels so difficult for you. What is the easiest logical fallacy for you to learn? 3. Find an example of common fallacies in everyday life on your own. You can examine any media to find a good one, or you can create an argument with a logical fallacy on your own. State it clearly, and explain what logical fallacy it commits to. 4. What is the most interesting thing you have learned in this lecture? What is the least interesting thing you have learned this week?[supanova_question]

Response Paper #3 Write a 1-2 page, single-spaced (12pt font, 1in margins) essay that critically engages with course concepts,

Philosophy Assignment Help Response Paper #3

Write a 1-2 page, single-spaced (12pt font, 1in margins) essay that critically engages with course concepts, arguments, or issues from relevant class material and discussions (see the list below). Your paper should NOT merely summarize or paraphrase the arguments, concepts, or claims. Instead, your aim is to add something new to the discussion. That is, I want you to add your voice and insights. Imagine the readings and relevant ideas/arguments as part of a dialogue in which you are a participant. Your response paper is your contribution to this discussion and, thus, should add value to the dialogue. In terms of topic, you can address one of the questions listed below OR you can choose your own topic. The decision is entirely your own.
Readings:
Medina, Introduction [supanova_question]

Write a paper of approximately 300 words in response to the following prompt. The paper should be in your own

Write a paper of approximately 300 words in response to the following prompt. The paper should be in your own words. This means that it is not substantially merely a cut-and-paste from the lecture slides or quotations. Turn in the paper in doc, docx, or pdf form using the paper clip icon available when you choose to submit your assignment. Be sure to read the paper prompt completely and to check the assignment rubric before starting your work. Your paper will automatically be checked by SafeAssign for plagiarism. Explain the problem of evil making sure to describe how the atheist would argue for each key claim. Explain how the theist could use free will to try to respond to this problem.[supanova_question]

Your response MUST reflect familiarity with the assigned reading Chapter 3 chapters. PLEASE SEE ALL THE ATTACHMENTS. Answer the

Your response MUST reflect familiarity with the assigned reading Chapter 3 chapters. PLEASE SEE ALL THE ATTACHMENTS.

Answer the question (no citation needed):
The most common viewpoint adopted by college students today is ethical relativism, and this is probably because it seems to be the most tolerant and fair-minded position, in that it respects diversity and individuality. However, Rosenstand points to a number of problems with ethical relativism. Where do you place yourself on this spectrum of moral stances? Are you a moral skeptic or a moral subjectivist? an ethical relativist? a moral absolutist? If you have never thought about this before, now is the time to do so. Explain why you hold the viewpoint you do, and defend that view from what might be seen as at least one major difficulty with adopting that ethical stance.
[supanova_question]

“The family that walks on all fours” (2006) Watch this BBC documentary from neuropsychologist Nicholas Humprey channel. Youtube link

“The family that walks on all fours” (2006)

Watch this BBC documentary from neuropsychologist Nicholas Humprey channel.

Youtube link (without CC): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwiz-yhLpT0

With CC: https://smartplayer.captionsync.com/play.php?vid=1545162960ssumner_acd3e45673c0

Answer the following questions:

1. Identify the analytic approach: who takes this approach? (Identify the scientist) What does it consist of?

2. Identify the structural approach : who takes this approach? (Identify the scientist) What does it consist of?

3. What do you think is the best approach in this case? Why?

4. What factors do you think are going to affect our decision to go for an analytical or a structural approach?

5. Do you think we always need to choose between one approach or the other? Can we combine them? Can you think of a case where the two approaches complement each other?

Important:

Your report needs to be between 300 and 600 words.

Focus on answering the questions.

[supanova_question]

Write about 4 pages/1,400 words (double-spaced, 12pt font) on the following topic: In Problema I and II of Fear

Philosophy Assignment Help Write about 4 pages/1,400 words (double-spaced, 12pt font) on the following topic:
In Problema I and II of Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard argues that our ethical duties
may be suspended in the pursuit of “absolute” (religious) duties. Explain how he arrives
at this conclusion through his analysis of Abraham as a knight of faith, and then offer
commentary on whether you think Abraham was justified in so acting.
Your essay should offer an accurate and nuanced analysis of Abraham’s faith and trial (by,
e.g., analyzing the righteous and ethical interpretations, and/or explaining Abraham’s
paradox of will); your essay should explain why Abraham is not a tragic hero, nor an
aesthetic individual, and should explain and contrast the aesthetic, ethical, and religious
ways of life. Finally, do you agree that there exist “higher” non-ethical duties (religious or
otherwise) that warrant suspending our ethical duties? You may answer this question
through an analysis of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac or through another example. In any
case, you should provide an argument (pro or con) whether you think Abraham (or
persons generally) are ever justified in suspending their ethical duties to satisfy non-
ethical commitments. In other words, your thesis should address the following question:
Is the highest goal or purpose of human life to live ethically?[supanova_question]

Your first paper will be due on March 10th, on Blackboard. It should be 3-4 pages, double-spaced, in 12-pt.

Your first paper will be due on March 10th, on Blackboard. It should be 3-4 pages, double-spaced, in 12-pt. font, with standard margins. (Note: everything above the first line of the essay itself does not count towards the 3-page minimum.) Your paper should refer to at least three of the authors we have read so far (out of Plato, Aristotle, Tolstoy, Freeland, and Barthes). See the document entitled ‘Paper Guidelines and Writing Tips’ to get a sense of how a good paper should be composed.

Choose ONE of the following topics:

1) What is the purpose of art?[supanova_question]

12 point, Times new roman font, Double Spaced Question:Do you think we ever have transparent self-knowledge of our own

12 point, Times new roman font, Double Spaced

Question:Do you think we ever have transparent self-knowledge of our own desires? In your answer, be sure to (i) explain what transparent self-knowledge is (as opposed to self-knowledge we acquire by testimony or by observing ourselves); (ii) explain the reasoning behind your answer

I have attached two sources I considered using. None are mandatory, but If I were to use any it would be these two[supanova_question]

This a philosophical essay that needs to compare the moral commitments , religion , and virtue of Socrates and

This a philosophical essay that needs to compare the moral commitments , religion , and virtue of Socrates and Confucius . PLEASE use the examples attached in my document or it wont qualify . also
Essay must be double-spaced in 12 point standard font (such as Times New Roman or Calibri), with 1” margins, and must have numbered pages.
please use sources from the book , if additional attached that is fine.[supanova_question]

A. Briefly explain Adam Smith’s three points about human nature as well as how they lead to a system

Philosophy Assignment Help A. Briefly explain Adam Smith’s three points about human nature as well as how they lead to a system of exchange. Next, explain the ‘Invisible Hand’ and the role it is supposed to play in such a system. Provide a criticism of his view. Does the criticism succeed? Explain your answer.

B. State (in premise/conclusion form) Robert Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain argument, then explain it. Next, provide a criticism of the argument. Does the criticism succeed? Explain your answer.

C. State and explain John Rawls’ difference principle as well as why he believes we would choose it in the original position. Provide a criticism of the difference principle. Does the criticism succeed? Explain your answer.

D. State (in premise/conclusion form) Peter Singer’s argument for our obligation to prevent some absolute poverty, then explain it. Next, provide a criticism of the argument. Does the criticism succeed? Explain your answer.[supanova_question]

Topic: The Matrix (1999) * Through your reading you’ve come across some big philosophical questions…some of these questions you

Topic: The Matrix (1999)
* Through your reading you’ve come across some big philosophical questions…some of these questions you might find more obvious in conversation, etc. around you now.
* For this reflection, watch a movie and pick out some philosophical topics — pick out one of those topics and explore your own ideas and thoughts on that topic.
Grading Information:
* Make sure to put the title of your movie and what the topic or philosophical question you’re talking about in the first paragraph.
* Reflection must be a minimum of 300 words.
* Reflection must use proper grammar. (Note that this assignment goes through a plagiarism checker as well as a grammar checker, so if you find issues, please make sure you edit your work and resubmit. — with that said, you can resubmit the assignment as many times as you would like until the due date. The last submission will be the only one viewed and graded.)
* Use APA formatting for references (if any – including the text). For more information on how to cite in APA format, check out the following link: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site.
* Submission must be submitted on or before the due date – no late submissions will be accepted.
[supanova_question]

IS THE RACIAL CONTRACT THEORY FOR ANALYSING THE PLACE OF RACE IN POLITICAL THEORY?

Attached below is the marking criteria and an example essay for further assistance. This essay needs a clear thesis statement (e.g. This essay will argue..) and in-text citation with the page numbers included. The bibliography must be in Harvard style. This essay must use the four sources below (especially the one by mills) to demonstrate a good understanding of the key debates of these sources. However, additional sources can be used as long they are academic sources.[supanova_question]

The subtitle of “Bartleby, The Scrivener” is “A Story of Wall-street.” Taking your cue from this metonymy, write an

The subtitle of “Bartleby, The Scrivener” is “A Story of Wall-street.” Taking your cue from this metonymy, write an essay in which you explain what it means to read this short story as a critique of American capitalism. Why is it significant that this story takes place on Wall-street? How does it comment on economic class relations in 19th-century American society? What kind of class relations are present in the office? How does the focus on social class help us to understand the figure of Bartleby? In your essay, be sure to attend to the importance of characterization, as well as the specific language that is used to depict key scenes and events in this story.[supanova_question]

I have a rough draft of my essay and I got a bad grade on it. I will upload

Philosophy Assignment Help I have a rough draft of my essay and I got a bad grade on it. I will upload my essay and article that are required to finish the assignment. There are three main articles you have to read through to figure out the point of this work. please make my essay become a high-level essay. Thank you!

The Forum has three article about my topic, and please follow the instruct to finish it.[supanova_question]

Summary of the ideas articulated by Sartre on bigotry. Include in your short paper an example of bigotry (be

Summary of the ideas articulated by Sartre on bigotry. Include in your short paper an example of bigotry (be sure to include a link to the article or news piece that you are using as an example) and explain how it links up with Sartre’s ideas. Link it up also with one or more of the quotations from James Baldwin.
[supanova_question]

Your film analysis paper essay should be approximately 1000 words (3-4 pages) analyzing the documentary Being in the World

Your film analysis paper essay should be approximately 1000 words (3-4 pages) analyzing the documentary Being in the World (Links to an external site.).

The essay is due TBD at midnight. Submit it here on Canvas, there is no need to bring a hard copy.

Your essay will be composed of three sections: a) conceptual analysis of a key existentialist idea (herd instinct, anxiety, ressentiment, authenticity, etc.), b) tracing and explicating that concept through the film (plot, character development, analysis of specific scenes), and c) personal reflection on the meaning and significance of this concept in modern life.

Your essay should be approximately 1000 words (plan on writing about 350 words for each section).
Use as a beginning point the Film Analysis Worksheet Download Film Analysis Worksheet that we used in class.
Do not use secondary sources; keep your analysis focused on the primary texts we have used in class.
Give textual evidence for your claims with proper reference to the author of the selection and page number from our textbook: “… your quotation …” (Kierkegaard, 56).
Introduce your ideas, explain your positions, and use the text for support.
Do not let the quotes write your paper. Always explain and make explicit your interpretation of the quote.
Include the word count at the end of your paper.
Make sure you have three distinct sections for your paper, and title each section.
For example, you may want to write a paper discussing the concept of authenticity, using the carpenter from the documentary as your focus, and apply it to your life by talking about what constitutes meaningful work. Perhaps your thesis statement would be “An authentic life is only possible if one’s gainful employment involves doing a type of work that is meaningful for one.”
Or, following the format I suggested: “The movie Being-in-the-World illustrates through its depiction of the carpenter Hiroshi Sakaguchi the existentialist claim that an authentic life requires that one’s commitments, such as the work one does, are true to one’s passions. I agree that engaging in work that one is passionate about is necessary for a life that is more authentically lived.”
Then you may title your sections: “A) Authenticity; B) Tools of the Trade: The case of Hiroshi Sakaguchi; C) Meaningful Work”
In your paper you would develop the concept of authenticity, its relation to meaningful work, explaining what makes Sakaguchi’s trade “authentic” in the Heideggerian sense, and finally apply it to your life or our contemporary world. Make sure you clearly state the main point you want to argue for (your thesis statement) and use it as your compass throughout your essay.
Make your position and argument stronger by considering and responding to at least one possible objection.
Make sure your essay is a coherent whole that has
a catchy title.
an introductory paragraph with your thesis statement (the position you will defend/ support in your essay), and a hook to get your reader interested.
coherent and well-organized main body paragraphs that develop your ideas and guide your reader through your argument. Each paragraph should have a clearly identifiable topic sentence. Each paragraph should meaningfully contribute to your overall argument.
a concluding paragraph, summarizing what you have argued for and what you have accomplished.
[supanova_question]

The essay can be any topic(you can change) and just based on the reading is fine. To respond in

The essay can be any topic(you can change) and just based on the reading is fine.
To respond in a more focused and deeply considered way, analyze how it is treated in the text. You may make an argument or you may simply and precisely explicate what is being argued in the text.[supanova_question]

In about 3/4 of a page, explain why utilitarians view human life both in life and in death as having

Philosophy Assignment Help In about 3/4 of a page, explain why utilitarians view human life both in life and in death as having instrumental value only. explain why Kant views human life as having intrinsic value. State Kant’s Principle of Humanity. Explain the purpose of the principle as limiting human actions. First, what would you do if faced with a situation where you had to end another person’s life for a greater good? Do not concern yourself with other situations where you might be forced to kill, such as war or self-defense. The question here concerns only whether you would end a life JUST to benefit others, mostly by getting or saving resources. Second, what are the main consequences that result from this decision? Third, what personal values led you to the choice you made? First, do some research about one of these disadvantaged groups and show your reader that you are aware of how they are being USED in the United States. Second, do some research on a different bias against a different group and show your reader that you are aware of how they are being USED in a country or culture other than the United States. Make sure at the end Formatting, Citations and Bibliography.[supanova_question]

If you blink, you’ll miss this supposed sighting of the New Jersey Devil in the video below. There’s no Essay

If you blink, you’ll miss this supposed sighting of the New Jersey Devil in the video below. There’s no sound with it, just a flash of something and a claim that it may be the Jersey Devil or a prank. Or it may be something else. Critical thinking can certainly be of some help with this and should definitely weigh in on the claim. Because if good thinkers don’t, you can imagine what would come next with a video like this on social media. “Jersey Devil confirmed!” “Actual citing of the Jersey Devil caught on video!” We can all imagine the headlines. But would those headlines be true? That is what you need to determine in your assignment this week.

The first thing to do is view the video. You might even pause it at times to get a good look. Find at least two credible sources (this may be hard) about what the Jersey Devil is supposed to be, and then read the section in the chapter entitled “Making Weird Mistakes”. Use those mistaken ideas to see if the claims you have found about the Jersey Devil are actually misleading and fall into the trap of sloppy thinking. Then provide your considered point of view about the Jersey Devil.

This exercise has broader implications than the New Jersey Devil. What do you think of social media sites that routinely use this sort of material to entice viewers with questionable and sensationalist material? Yes, they are out to sell these materials to make money for themselves and advertisers, but what do they do to the average viewers who may not critically assess what they are shown? How gullible do you think the American public is and what can we do about it?

Create a Word document for your paper which should be double-spaced, 1 1/2 to 2 pages. Provide MLA citations for your sources, and then submit the paper above.

https://youtu.be/cXjUDCA2ovI

Watch video to answer questions.[supanova_question]

Write a two page paper (no more than 600 words) exploring the relationship between descriiptive relativism and moral relativism.

Write a two page paper (no more than 600 words) exploring the relationship between descriiptive relativism and moral relativism. Explain what each kind of relativism is and then explain the “argument from disagreement” (Drefcinski). What does the argument from disagreement claim? Why does the argument fail?

Important instructions: The paper must be double-spaced (12 pt font) and include the word count at the top of the paper. All quotations should be properly cited using the Chicago Manual of Style (Links to an external site.) format (Links to an external site.) (see link for details). The paper must be your own work and every submission is automatically checked for plagiarism. Any plagiarism will result in zero credit.

Read the the Writing Papers Tips before attempting this paper which includes much more information on my expectations, including a general rubric, and formatting.

Turn in Checklist: (automatic points off for missing any of these)

All words taken from any other source are clearly marked as quotations and cited with footnotes
No cover page
Double-spaced; 12 point font; word count at top (600 max)
No Bibliography or Works Cited page (footnotes only)[supanova_question]

Answer the following questions fully: 1. What is an implicit premise? How could we find it? Give an example of Essay

Answer the following questions fully: 1. What is an implicit premise? How could we find it? Give an example of an argument with an implicit premise. Then make the argument explicit. 2. What is a complex argument? Find a complex argument on your own (or you can make one on your own), and try to challenge the others to analyze it. 3. What is the most interesting thing you have learned in this chapter? Why so? What is the most difficult thing you have learned in this chapter? Why so?[supanova_question]

Page Count: 6-8 pages (1500-1800 words) with 6 FULL pages or 1,500 words written minimum. Abstract, title page, and

Philosophy Assignment Help Page Count: 6-8 pages (1500-1800 words) with 6 FULL pages or 1,500 words written minimum. Abstract, title page, and reference page do NOT count in the page or word count.

NOTE: As you put this together, are you following the critical analysis process that we emphasize in critical reasoning? That is, fairly considering all research before reaching a conclusion.

Introduction: Includes background information on your topic. Define key terms that are part of this topic. Give background information on why this topic is how something has changed or developed from an earlier time to its current form.
Arguments that support one position (2-3 paragraphs)
Rebuttals (What are the best arguments on the other side of your issue? (2-3 paragraphs)
Applicable rhetorical devices or fallacies commonly used in debating this topic.
A statement of your conclusion (as the researcher) on the issue (What are your conclusions based on the research you did and the most convincing arguments.
Minimum 5 research references in APA format, and in-text citations in your paragraphs.
“The Purpose of this Essay: The goal of this paper is to construct a fair-minded, unbiased, analytical analysis of a topic in a comprehensive essay.

This is NOT an opinion piece NOR is it a persuasive essay that simply aims to prove or reinforce what you already believe; this would be Confirmation Bias, and bias is to be avoided in this project.
This project needs to avoid harsh rhetoric or language that is harmful and hurtful in nature; the point to be object and unemotional in your approach.
This essay SHOULD be written in fair, academic, respectful, and most importantly analytical manner regardless of any of your opinions, feelings, or preconceived notions about the topic.
Both sides of your topic must be treated with equal attention both in terms of the number and quality of sources and in terms of the depth and breadth of their presentation in your essay. Both sides should have about the same number of quality source and about the same number of equally sized paragraphs addressing the details of their argument in roughly equivalent detail.
There MUST be 2 paragraphs in this project that identify and define rhetorical devices and logical fallacies on both sides of the argument; be sure to indicate which specific rhetorical device and fallacy you have found, and that there is evidence in your sources of these course concepts in practice that is cited in your paper.
You will present statements and claims for and analyzing BOTH sides of the topic; only then should you state you own conclusion as an objective, critical thinker given the information presented”
Required Sections:

1) A Properly Formatted APA Title Page
2) A Properly Formatted APA Abstract
3) Intro paragraph
For example, you may choose any of the following:
State the topic directly.
Define the Problem.
Ask one Question and provide an answer.
Tell a short, brief story related to the topic.
Use a brief quote and explain its meaning.
4) Side A Paragraph
Expand on the major sources and support with supplemental sources and evidence
5) Side B Paragraph
Expand on the major sources and support with supplemental sources
6) Rhetoric and Fallacies (One paragraph for side)
Be specific. Cite Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies used in sources and research; do NOT be general.
Present evidence from your sources that show the Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies being used
7) Concluding Paragraph
If the reader is to look at both sides equally and analyze both sides fairly, what conclusion should the reader reach?
The answer does not have to be absolute, but it should not be equivocal. If both sides have good arguments, which is better, even if only slightly better, and what is the argument that tips the scales in the sides’ favor? Why does that point tip the scales?
8) A Properly Formatted APA Reference Page
The Sources should appear in Alphabetical Order according to the last name of the first author listed on the source.
If there is no Author(s), then the source should be cited by Title or Organization.”[supanova_question]

In five pages (that is, in no fewer than five pages, and no more than five and a half

In five pages (that is, in no fewer than five pages, and no more than five and a half pages):

1) explain the general notion of knowledge as true judgement with an account, from the assigned excerpt of Plato’s Theaetetus;

2) explain one clarification or problem that Socrates and Theaetetus discuss along the way;

3) show how that notion of knowledge can be straightforwardly applied to something having to do with your major, or intended career path;

4) with 1) 2) [supanova_question]

The exam questions and instructions are attached below. Every question needs to be numbered (but not include the text

The exam questions and instructions are attached below. Every question needs to be numbered (but not include the text of the original question). Each answer should take up at most half of a double-spaced typed page (12 point font, Times New Roman, one inch margins). Since there are 16 questions total, the document you submit should have no more than 8 pages. There is an attached file that will tell you about the instruction details and i apologize for attaching too many files 🙁 they are all needed since the answers will be from the readings! Btw I got 80 on the previous assignment that you helped me! Thank you![supanova_question]

impact of heavy metal on three of these six countries Lebanon, Iran, Egypt, Saudia Arabia, Israel-Palestine, Syria

[1] Riahp Paper. This paper contributes up to 200 points. This is drawn from and will take up three countries. There are 6 to choose from (Lebanon, Iran, Egypt, Saudia Arabia, Israel-Palestine, Syria). Here are the guidelines for the paper – use the [a], [b], [c] format when writing.

[a] for each country describe the aesthetics of the music where the aesthetics includes the following: music, lyrics, performance, expressiveness of musicians, expressive engagement of listeners or what it’s like to be at metal concerts and engaging the music; then

[b] connect the aesthetics of metal with the politics in the daily life of metalheads; finally,

[c] tell readers what it’s like for you to come to know (if you’re coming to know this) how important heavy metal is to the lives of young Muslims in the countries you’ve chosen to write about. RIAHP papers are typed, 1.5 spaced, 3 – 4 pages[supanova_question]

1.Choose 2 of the 3 following arguments for the existence of God 1) The Ontological Argument 2) The Cosmological Essay

Philosophy Assignment Help 1.Choose 2 of the 3 following arguments for the existence of God 1) The Ontological Argument 2) The Cosmological Argument, 3) The Argument from Design (Teleological).
Unpack each of the two arguments using the relevant primary sources. This section of your paper should address: Who is making this argument and what does the argument say? What problem is it trying to solve? How does it address this problem? What are some of the argument’s strengths, and what are some of its weaknesses?
Then address which argument you find more compelling and why, or if you find neither argument compelling, why not?
[supanova_question]

a Comparative examination of the classical thinkers of our course, whose theories of conflict and change played a decisive

a Comparative examination of the classical thinkers of our course, whose theories of conflict and change played a decisive role in the formation of contemporary culture, art, and politics. As much as their methods vary, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud meet in a shared critique (or, “hermeneutics of suspicion”) of self, value and society. But they also diverge in their analytical categories, critical methods, and theoretical vocabulary: historical materialism, post-metaphysical philosophy, and theory of the unconscious, respectively. In your paper, therefore, you are expected to articulate points of contrast as well as convergence in their writings from a specific lens. Your paper should critically discuss the value and limits of each of these thinkers’ methods of critique, and their respective diagnoses of modern culture and society. You must identify your specific topic, submit an outline

–> I need a thesis, an outline that can help catalyze a 1300 word essay.[supanova_question]

for someone that can take my Intro to philosophy class for me the class just started today, I need someone who will be on time with every assignment and keep me updated . I really need to pass this class with an A OR B so if you can’t do that please don’t reply. I also need someone I can keep in contact with and I can rely on. I need someone who is really good with essays and quizzes and know what they are talking about

Im looking for someone that can take my Intro to philosophy class for me, the class just started today, I need someone who will be on time with every assignment and keep me updated . I really need to pass this class with an A OR B so if you can’t do that please don’t reply. I also need someone I can keep in contact with and I can rely on, Ive had bad experiences with this website so please don’t waste my time. I also need someone I can keep in contact with and I can rely on. I need someone who is really good with essays and quizzes and know what they are talking about. I will provide my log in and password. Also I need someone who is willing to give me there WhatsApp so that I can keep in contact.[supanova_question]

and stick the material as much as you can. external materials are allowed, but should be limited

International relations scholars have debated the relative merits of realism and liberalism as a guide for policy maker for generations. Write a short essay in which you clearly compare and contrast realism and idealism/liberalism with regards to how states should conduct themselves in the International arena. How does Nye’s soft power fit into this? As a normative theory — one that prescribes how countries ought to act in the international system — which do you find the most persuasive guide to action?

[supanova_question]

Philosophy Question

Philosophy Assignment Help You are to write an essay explaining and evaluating what you learned in this course The purpose of this assignment is for you to demonstrate your understanding of one of the central debates in philosophy by explaining what you learned about that issue.
Your essay must be 2-3 pages, double-spaced, in 12-point font.
I will be evaluating your essay based on the following criteria.
Regarding your content development, you will be graded based on the quality of your writing. I expect you to start with an introduction that motivates the project and plainly states what you learned and finish with a conclusion that both summarizes your evaluation of the position clearly and explores implications or limitations of your assessment. In addition, your essay must have a clear and logical organizational plan as well, with ideas, sentences, and paragraphs building naturally in support of your thesis. To accomplish this, you must make sure your organizational plan would be obvious to the reader, and you must use transitional words, phrases, and sentences to show how your sentences and paragraphs relate to each other and to your thesis.
To demonstrate your mastery of the relevant conventions of philosophical writing, you will need to provide a clear and complete explanation of the position you are discussing. In addition, you will also need to provide a clear and complete explanation of the relevant alternative views discussed in the lesson and draw a clear contrast between all of these views.
To demonstrate your understanding of the context and purpose of this assignment, you should provide a clear example that illustrates to the reader the relevance of this debate to your life. Your example needs to be realistic, and you need to come up with it on your own. You will also need to explain how the example illustrates the position under discussion.
Concerning the appropriate use of sources and evidence, I expect you to explain and evaluate the relevant arguments or considerations from the lessons both for and against the position under discussion, in detail and with clarity. In your evaluation of each argument, you will need to explain whether the premises are true, whether the reasoning is valid, and why you think so. Further, you will need to consider and assess at least one possible objection to each argument and then provide a sufficiently compelling overall evaluation of the argument in light of this objection.
Finally, to demonstrate your control of syntax and mechanics, I expect you to skillfully communicate your meaning to the reader with clarity and virtually no grammatical mistakes. Overall, your essay must be clear, with well-developed paragraphs, complete and grammatical sentences, and words chosen for their precise meanings.
[supanova_question]

should not be less than 400 words. The essays prompts are found below. You will notice that there are several sub-questions for each prompt: you are not necessarily bound to those sub-questions, and may develop your response to the prompt as you see fit. However, you will probably be in good shape if you can, in fact, answer the sub- questions for the prompt. It is recommended that sub-questions that are underlined should not be neglected. Please note that some questions are factual and others are interpretative. For example, the question, ‘what are the charges brought against Socrates?’ does have a factual answer, and you can certainly provide an incorrect answer; alternatively, the question, ‘what is Plato trying to accomplish in the dialogue, Euthyphro?’ would require an interpretation—an interpretation nevertheless based on the text and not on groundless speculation

I warn you, again, against relying on the internet or secondary resources. Take a bit of time to engage with the texts. Additionally, this is not an opportunity for you to philosophize freely about knowledge, virtue, the soul, etc.; though, of course, you should feel free to share your own answers on the matter once you have demonstrated your understanding of a given text. To be clear, you will not receive credit if your answers have nothing to do with the text. Additionally, if I detect malicious plagiarism you will receive zero credit.[supanova_question]

Draft a strong thesis before you begin working on the paper -use the attached sample paper for guidance – the

Draft a strong thesis before you begin working on the paper -use the attached sample paper for guidance – the only source that can be used is the gender section of the uploaded pages – for citing just put (as stated in the book pg…., “…”) File 1: sample paper ( the sample paper is a B grade paper.. this paper must be more in-depth than the sample paper) File 2: The course text (this is the only source of information that you can quote in the paper) This paper is to be 5 pages times new roman single spaced In this paper It will explore one socio-political, cultural, religious, or theological phenomena utilizing a theory or framework we’ve discussed in the course so far. Find a theory or framework surrounding gender out of the course text in file 2 and draft a thesis My teacher is approving these thesis statements in real time so after you submit the thesis you would like to write on I will either respond with “ok” or an acceptable thesis There after we can begin the paper The deadline is tuesday at midnight[supanova_question]

use any source other than the links I have attached below, please. If you use sources other than these, I will not be able to accept the assignment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92UfAJr7790 https://towardsdatascience.com/the-bayesian-brain-hypothesis-35b98847d331 https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/the-tragic-success-of-nazi-propaganda-8f6a04926592 https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/bonhoeffers-theory-of-stupidity-explains-the-world-perfectly-957cbb3fbac1

In our study of the brain so far this semester we have considered some attractive features of its functions. These include an ability to revise our understanding of the world around us on the basis of new information, the capacity for rational thought and decision making, and the ability to understand the emotions of others as well as our own. Taken together, these present a quite positive picture of the potential of human beings. And yet, as we know, human history gives evidence of human behaviour that is not easily explained by this positive picture of human potential. As a basis for your understanding of this problem you must have read the article that was assigned for week 7, The tragic success of Nazi propaganda. It is posted in the Learning Content. This evaluation requires that you write a paper that considers this problem from a psychological perspective. In your paper ensure that you include a discussion of what we have learned about the brain, particularly the social brain, that is relevant to this issue. I have also posted one additional paper and one addition video to Learning content which some students may find helpful and utilize in their paper. Unlike the paper identified above, it is not required that you use these materials. They are meant to be an additional resource for those students who wish to use them. The paper is labeled A theory of Stupidity, and the video How did ordinary citizens become murderers. Please be aware, you must not use sources from outside those provided in the course. You may use any of the course materials provided since the beginning of the semester. These include lectures, slides and any videos or articles posted in Learning Content. Also remember that while it is acceptable to use direct quotes from these sources in your paper where that is appropriate, if you do that, you must cite the source. The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of course materials as well as an ability to think in an intelligent and integrative way about them. Strive to write clearly and to express your ideas in a well developed manner. Support the claims you make with discussion, explanation, elaboration or textual evidence. Your paper should be between 1,000 and 1, 500 words long.[supanova_question]

Philosophy 434

Philosophy Assignment Help Two paragraphs. The first paragraph should be a summary of the video, identify and and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the main issue in the scenario and make a connection to ethical principals and theories the second paragraph should argue for the position chosen and i chose option D. The scenario that the paper is supposed to be about https://we.tl/t-kxMFe46IAU
These are a couple links provided to help back up my position https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/…
https://abortion.procon.org/#pro_con
https://abortion.procon.org/#multimedia
https://abortion.procon.org/#Background
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
Complete the entire scenario.
Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?

Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
[supanova_question]

one of the Cierco virtue which may be beneficial to Usa

Use citations from our textbook (at least 2 per paragraph) plus 3 other scholarly source where most needed for support (e.g. access the JSTOR database online through UHD Library).
This is what you will see:

(30 points) 1. In my research, the hypothesis that the virtues secure public ethics was tested revealing that ________ would offer the greatest benefit. While Cicero does list 3 other virtues, the virtue of ________ most addresses the problem of _______ in US politics. Addressing that problem is crucial because it ________. Details of this finding include…

(30 points) 2. The problem of _____ seriously affects US politics by ______ or by _______. Other resolutions of the problem have been_______ or _______. But those fixes do not offer the benefit of the virtue of ______. The other fixes were not as useful because they ______. Details of their failure compared to the success of this virtue include…..

(30 points) 3. The virtue of _______ is most useful in this instance compared to the other 3 virtues of ____, _____, and ______. Here’s how: ___, ____, and ____. Details include….

(10 points) 4. References: alphabetical list of sources:

[supanova_question]

Philosophy Question

I have attached the Essay Guidelines and the Paper template to this. Make sure you read the Guidelines first, that includes the essay question. The template will tell you how the essay should look like and what the professor is looking for in the essay. The essay needs a book, I have also attached the book pdf
[supanova_question]

Read Cahn, Exploring Ethics, Chapter 4 – Subjectivism, by Julia Driver

In this Text Analysis try to give an answer to the questions below:
According to subjectivism, what is meant by saying that “lying is wrong”?
Why does Driver reject subjectivism?
In what ways, if any, do moral judgments differ from descriptive ones?
Do you suppose that those who believe moral judgments are a matter of personal preference would say the same about non-moral normative claims, such as “Susan is a good swimmer”?
Note: The article should have 300 words (without quotations of text).
[supanova_question]

Read Cahn, Exploring Ethics, Chapter 4 – Subjectivism, by Julia Driver

Philosophy Assignment Help In this Text Analysis try to give an answer to the questions below:
According to subjectivism, what is meant by saying that “lying is wrong”?
Why does Driver reject subjectivism?
In what ways, if any, do moral judgments differ from descriptive ones?
Do you suppose that those who believe moral judgments are a matter of personal preference would say the same about non-moral normative claims, such as “Susan is a good swimmer”?
Note: The article should have 300 words (without quotations of text).
[supanova_question]

Information Literacy Assignment Directions: 1. Choose a website to evaluate. Make it a website that is related to nursing or

Information Literacy Assignment Directions: 1. Choose a website to evaluate. Make it a website that is related to nursing or patient care. 2. Choose criteria categories with which to evaluate the website, defining those criteria. For example, you may use the Health Information Website Checklist found in table 9-1 in your text (page 144) which has criteria for: • Source • Authority • Finding • Validity and quality • Privacy and disclosure You can use other criteria to evaluate the website, however, be sure to define the criteria in your paper. 3. Evaluate the chosen website according to the categories of criteria. 4. Evaluate your chosen website in terms of strengths and weaknesses related to your criteria. 5. Your paper should be written in APA format. 6. Your paper should be no more than 6-7 pages. These 6-7 pages should include the: • Title page • Abstract page • Body of the paper • References page[supanova_question]