Peer Review Literature Discussion-Open Topic 1
Take a look at the peer reviewed literature and choose a peer-reviewed journal article about a nutrition related topic of your choice. This is your chance to follow up on topics of interest from previous reviews you have done or information presented in class. Review the paper and post a discussion to the group. You should post either a link to the paper or a copy of the reference for the paper in your post (your peers will not be able to follow a link to the library website, please download a pdf of the paper and post it if this is your source). The paper that you choose should be no more than 10 years old.Please review the paper and post a discussion to the group. You should post either a link to the paper or a copy of the paper in your post. The paper that you choose should be no more than 10 years old.Your write-up should consist of 5 separate paragraphs. In the first paragraph,summarize the findings of the paper. Then address each of the following questions:Write a paragraph discussing this question: “Were you surprised by the findings in the paper?”
Write a paragraph discussing what you found most interesting in the article?
Write a paragraph the describes a topic presented in this article you would like to evaluate further and why.
Finish your write-up with a paragraph that summarizes your presentation and thoughts. For full credit please include:1.An introductory paragraph summarizing the topic and findings of the paper. Be sure to include any interesting points presented in the introduction that were addressed in the conclusion or discussion of the paper.A separate paragraph to answer each of the questions posed above.
3. A summary paragraph that ties your review together for the reader.For full credit, review and post a comment on the papers of at least two other students. Peer Review Literature Discussion-RubricSpelling and grammar/organization (1)Link to peer-reviewed paper that works (1)Paragraph summarizing paper (2)Were you surprised by the findings in the paper? (1) (one paragraph)
What did you find most interesting in the article? (1) (one paragraph)
What topic presented in this article would you like to evaluate further? (1) (one paragraph)
A summary paragraph that ties your review together for the reader (2)
Comments on minimum of two other papers (1)[supanova_question]
Activity 5 – Flight Rubric Flight (1) Flight (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. What is
Activity 5 – Flight
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. What is convergent evolution?
Complete, clear definition 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Why are birds an example of convergent evolution?
Demonstrates student knows the meaning of convergent evolution and can name examples of other animals with similar features. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. What features of Archaeopteryx are dinosaur features?
Student demonstrates knowledge of features that mark the animal as dinosaur rather than bird. 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. What features of Archaeopteryx are bird features?
Student demonstrates knowledge of features that distinguish birds from dinosaurs. 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5. What features did Gansus have that makes it an intermediate species between Archaeopteryx and modern birds?
Student demonstrates understanding of the physical features that separate Gansus from Archaeopteryx and make it a true bird. 3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome6. What factors drove the evolution of flight in birds?
Student demonstrates understanding of the environmental factors that prompted animals to evolve flight. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome7. What evidence do scientists have that flight in birds evolved from the ground up?
Student shows knowledge of observations and experiments that demonstrate birds may have evolved flight from the ground up. 5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome8. What is the major difference between bird wings and bat wings?
Students analyzed and explain the differences between bat and bird wings. 2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome9. What animals have evolved the ability to fly?
Students list all animals that have evolved the ability to fly. 2 pts
Total Points: 25[supanova_question]
Culminating Project – Be an Expert on a Scientific Technology
Writing Assignment Help Culminating Project – Be an Expert on a Scientific Technology
The directions for your culminating project are in the pdf below. They are the same directions posted in Assignment 2 – Planning your Culminating Project. Read them carefully before starting your project. Pay particular attention to the rubric below (it’s also in the directions) – it will be used to grade the project and gives valuable information about what should be included.
Be sure your writing is good, college-level writing. Read your own work out loud to see if it makes sense. Have someone look over your writing to check for errors or places that need clarification. If you need further help, contact the Green River Writing Center – https://www.greenriver.edu/students/academics/tutoring-resources/writing-reading-center/Links to an external site.
Culminating Project – Technology.pdf
Culminating Project – Technology (1)
Culminating Project – Technology (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAll requirements met
• Handed in as a pdf • Single slide only • Title centered at top of page • Your name underneath title • Research questions at upper left • References in lower right corner 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
Before this technology, what was used? What were its shortcomings? Why was this particular technology needed in science, but particularly paleontology? 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription and history of development.
The instrument, technique, etc. is clearly illustrated and thoroughly described, including its purpose and how it functions. If it was originally developed for some other purpose and adapted for paleontology, that is included.Maps and illustrations show where the technology was developed, when, and who was the principle person (or group) responsible for the development. 20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContribution to the science
Illustrations and words describe at least three significant insights or changes in paleontological interpretations gained from using this technology 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary
A single short paragraph succinctly summarizes what was said in the poster . No new information is introduced here. 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation presented
Information complete, accurate, paraphrased. Citations given for text, images as needed, reference list appropriate. Writing is clear, grammar and spelling correct 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEasily read
Font is large enough and a style that is easy to read. Font and background color are such that good contrast makes the writing clearly visible. 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEye-catching
Poster is organized in such a manner that it is attractive and easy to follow. Background (if any) enhances the poster. 10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraphics enhance poster
Images are carefully chosen to clarify and illustrate the “story” of the poster. Images do most of the work and are supplemented by text explanations. They are sized so that they are easy to see clearly. Images are good quality. All images have captions and citations. 10 pts
Total Points: 100[supanova_question]
You will pick a situation Holbrooke had to face, from his book. You will then write a 3-page analysis with
You will pick a situation Holbrooke had to face, from his book. You will then write a 3-page analysis with clear and concise points on what happened and what you would have done the same or differently had you been in Holbrooke’s place. In your analysis, include what happened and why, followed by what you would have done and why.Make sure to have a solid and logically flowing arguments in your analysis.If you would not have done anything differently, include arguments for why Holbrooke’s strategy was the best answer to that situation.Remember, it is not enough to state what was done or would have been done. Rational, logically flowing arguments and descriptions are necessary.[supanova_question]
Commentary should be precise and concise, in providing substantial arguments about how the films go after (appropriate and respond to)
Commentary should be precise and concise, in providing substantial arguments about how the films go after (appropriate and respond to) the empires – Japanese colonialism, Chinese cinema, or Nationalist Party’sfilm policy, and Hollywood film industry or world market.The commentary must be typed, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on all four sides of the page. You should proof-read your writing carefully, making sure that there are no spelling,grammar, or punctuation mistakesSo there will be some readings and three movies. Please compare and comment on the movie. Pick a theme and argue it with movies and readings. The commentary should be about the movie and support your comment on movies with readings.The three movies are: 1. ??? The Bold, the Corrupt, and the Beautiful (dir. Yang Ya-che,2017). 2. 10 10 ??? (2010). 3. Le Moulin ???? (dir. Ya-li Huang, 2015)[supanova_question]