Professional and Business Ethics. Choose 5 DIFFERENT CASE STUDIES. You are to analyze ALL 5 of the case studies using ONLY ONE of the following ethical theories: Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism, Nozick’s theory, virtue ethics, Rawls’ theory, or Marxism.

1. Choose 5 DIFFERENT CASE STUDIES (these can be those we discuss or those we don’t; as long as they are from the TEXT, any case study will work). 2. You are to analyze ALL 5 of the case studies using ONLY ONE of the following ethical theories: Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism, Nozick’s theory, virtue ethics, Rawls’ theory, or Marxism. 3. Make sure you provide a paragraph that accurately describes the theory you will be using. 4. Make sure you describe the case study before you apply the theory. 5. Provide a general assessment of the paper. 6. Avoid using phrases like: “In my opinion,” “I believe,” “Ethics is difficult and not certain, so it is hard to tell if this ethical theory is right or not.” This is an ETHICS course, so don’t do or say anything in your ETHICS PAPER that would undermine ethics as a discipline. Further, you are making an ARGUMENT in this paper, as such, there is no room for “personal opinions” or “feelings.” Just turn those opinions and feelings into statements of fact. 7. This paper should be no less than 8 full pages and no more than 10. This paper should be well written, typed, doubled spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman (Or equivalent font). No cover sheet is needed. Include proper citation.[supanova_question]

answer the following fully: 1. What are the logical fallacies? How is a logical fallacy different from a good argument? Essay

answer the following fully: 1. What are the logical fallacies? How is a logical fallacy different from a good argument? How can a fallacy be persuasive even if it is not logically good? 2. Name one of the most difficult logical fallacies you have encountered in this lecture. Explain why it feels so difficult for you. What is the easiest logical fallacy for you to learn? 3. Find an example of common fallacies in everyday life on your own. You can examine any media to find a good one, or you can create an argument with a logical fallacy on your own. State it clearly, and explain what logical fallacy it commits to. 4. What is the most interesting thing you have learned in this lecture? What is the least interesting thing you have learned this week?[supanova_question]

Response Paper #3 Write a 1-2 page, single-spaced (12pt font, 1in margins) essay that critically engages with course concepts,

Philosophy Assignment Help Response Paper #3

Write a 1-2 page, single-spaced (12pt font, 1in margins) essay that critically engages with course concepts, arguments, or issues from relevant class material and discussions (see the list below). Your paper should NOT merely summarize or paraphrase the arguments, concepts, or claims. Instead, your aim is to add something new to the discussion. That is, I want you to add your voice and insights. Imagine the readings and relevant ideas/arguments as part of a dialogue in which you are a participant. Your response paper is your contribution to this discussion and, thus, should add value to the dialogue. In terms of topic, you can address one of the questions listed below OR you can choose your own topic. The decision is entirely your own.
Readings:
Medina, Introduction [supanova_question]

Write a paper of approximately 300 words in response to the following prompt. The paper should be in your own

Write a paper of approximately 300 words in response to the following prompt. The paper should be in your own words. This means that it is not substantially merely a cut-and-paste from the lecture slides or quotations. Turn in the paper in doc, docx, or pdf form using the paper clip icon available when you choose to submit your assignment. Be sure to read the paper prompt completely and to check the assignment rubric before starting your work. Your paper will automatically be checked by SafeAssign for plagiarism. Explain the problem of evil making sure to describe how the atheist would argue for each key claim. Explain how the theist could use free will to try to respond to this problem.[supanova_question]