Multiple Choice then Explanation. Please write your answers to the questions and their sub-parts in

Question: Multiple Choice then Explanation. Please write your answers to the questions and their sub-parts in the space provided. Please make sure that any handwrittenanswers are legible. Also, please be sure to explain your answer choice completely but succinctly. 1. The Internal Revenue Service believes that Hunter’s company is underreporting income. The IRSMultiple Choice then Explanation. Please write your answers to the questions and their sub-parts in the space provided. Please make sure that any handwrittenanswers are legible. Also, please be sure to explain your answer choice completely but succinctly.

1. The Internal Revenue Service believes that Hunter’s company is underreporting income. The IRS begins an investigation and asks Hunter to disclose the company bookkeeping documents. Hunter is reluctant to do so, forcing the IRS to issue a(n) (A) motion for interpleader; (B) arrest warrant; (C) subpoena duces tecum; (D) interpretive rule.

Answer:______​Explanation:

For which of the following activities can a foreign sovereign be sued in an American court? (A) Operating a factory dangerously; (B) Issuing a law that discriminates against a certain group of people; (C) Suspending the civil rights of its people; (D) None of the above

Answer:______​Explanation:

Christopher must make a decision regarding marketing a new product for his company. The company has developed a shampoo to help reduce hair loss. In marketing the product, Christopher wants to act ethically by following the categorical imperative. In doing so, he will decide to (A) not market the product because, while the product would substantially increase the bottom line for Christopher’s company, research has shown that the product could actually increase hair loss in a small percentage of users and thus cause them emotional pain; (B) not market the product because research has shown the product to be ineffective, and Christopher would not want other companies to market ineffective products; (C) aggressively market the product because research has shown that the product does reduce hair loss in a high percentage of users, and statistics show that a majority of the U.S. population is suffering from hair loss and desires an effective product; (D) market the product because research has shown that, even though the product is only somewhat effective, Christopher feels comfortable having his marketing campaign reported on in the media.

Answer:______​Explanation:

Grunnings, an American manufacturer of drills and drilling equipment, has been asked to provide construction equipment to a foreign government. The contract is for a sizable amount of money, so Grunnings wants to protect itself if the foreign government refuses to pay for the equipment once it has been delivered. What should Grunnings require in its contract with the foreign government if it wants to protect its right to sue the government if the government does not pay for the goods? (A) a release of sovereignty; (B) a statement of extraterritoriality; (C) a waiver of sovereign immunity; (D) a submission to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice

Answer:______​Explanation:

Outdoor Technologies (an Australian company) was involved in a contract dispute with Silver Star Limited (a Chinese company). Outdoor prevailed in the litigation in the Australian courts and obtained a judgment for $500,000.00 against Silver Star (a Chinese company) from the Australian courts. Silver Star owned property in Iowa, so Outdoor filed suit in Iowa to enforce and collect the Australian judgment. Which of the following statements is true? (A) Outdoor cannot collect in the United States a judgment that was issued by an Australian court. (B) Outdoor cannot collect in the United States because Silver Star is not an American company. (C) Outdoor can collect in the United States if the proceeding in the Australian courts was fair and proper. (D) Outdoor can collect in the United States, because both the United States and Australia have common law systems.

Answer:______​Explanation:

Doralee faces a difficult ethical dilemma at work and is tempted to lie to her boss, Franklin, about her involvement in a work project. Doralee realizes she would not feel comfortable lying to her spouse, however. In deciding what she should do, Doralee might want to consider (A) the legality of her actions; (B) whether a statute applies to this situation or not; (C) the Life Principles that she has developed; (D) nothing (she should do whatever she wants to do).

Answer:______​Explanation:

Shane, while attending a state university, is accused of sexually assaulting a fellow student. Based on these allegations, Shane is expelled from the university without a hearing. Shane can argue that his (A) First Amendment rights are violated because he is not allowed to protest the expulsion; (B) Fourteenth Amendment rights are being violated because he is not being treated equally under the law; (C Fifth Amendment rights are being violated because he is subject to a taking of his property; (D) Fifth Amendment rights are being violated because he is not being afforded due process under the law.

Answer: explain:

The Ohio state legislature is concerned because people guilty of lesser drug offenses are languishing in prison. The legislature passes a statute that requires probation instead of imprisonment for these offenders. The governor of Ohio supports the statute, as do Ohio district attorneys. A victim of a drug-related offense asks an Ohio court to consider the fact that this statute violates the Ohio state constitution. The court agrees and voids the statute. This is an example of (A) judicial power; (B) legislative power; (C) executive power; (D) administrative power.

Answer:______​Explanation:

In 1992, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in a case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., that when a substance in food causes injury to a consumer of the food, it is not a bar to recovery against the seller that the substance was natural to the food. If, in a 2008 case involving a consumer’s injury caused by a fish bone in a bowl of fish chowder, the court followed the decision in Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the court’s action in the second case is an example of (A) stare decisis; (B) judicial review; (C) statutory interpretation; (D) public law.

Answer:______​Explanation:

10.
10. Anna Mae is a freshman at her local public high school. Her sister, Celestine, attends a nearby private high school. Neither school allows them to join its respective wrestling team; only boys can wrestle at either school. Which of the sisters has a winning case based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? (A) Anna Mae; (B) Celestine; (C) Both Anna Mae and Celestine; (D) Neither Anna Mae nor Celestine

Answer:______​Explanation:
Ans 1- option(c) subpoena duces tecum subpoena duces tecum is…View the full answer