healthcare improvement residential center

The Joint Commission (E-dition) sets standards for healthcare quality and safety. One set of standards The Joint Commission created is the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG), which are designed for different facilities and are critical to maintain accreditation. In this assignment, you will explore the NPSG standards related to patient identification, which states facilities will use at least two patient identifiers before procedures.This assignment will help prepare you for your course project through the analysis of data, dashboards, and industry standards.Please note: The Joint Commission standards you have access to are the standards for acute care facilities and not long-term care. In this assignment, the standards for patient identification are the same for acute care and long-term care facilities.PromptExamine the dashboard for ABC Residential Center, which is a long-term care center. Analyze the facility metrics against the national benchmarks and address the following areas. Provide at least two scholarly sources to support your claims.Three bar graphs depicting the National Average of Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month, ABC Residential Center Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month, State Average of Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month respectively and one line graph for Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month, and another radar graph depicting Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month.A text-only version is available: Module Three Short Paper Graphic Text-Only Version Word DocumentSpecifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:Insights from dashboards: Describe how the data in the dashboard could be used by ABC Residential Center to find insights related to their operations or quality of care.Dashboard techniques: Discuss what visualization techniques (such as using charts and graphs; color coding the data red, yellow, and green; and combining multiple sets of data into one graph) were used by the dashboard to provide a quick, visual way to understand the data presented, and if there are additional techniques you would recommend for the dashboard to use to make the data easier and quicker to understand.Determining benchmarks: Determine a benchmark for patient identification for ABC (you should review the NPSG standards).Defend selection: Provide a rationale for your selection of a benchmark.If you chose a benchmark less than 100%, how would you defend that benchmark to the public?Meeting the benchmark: Analyze the data in the dashboard to determine if ABC is meeting the benchmark.Implications: Discuss the implications of not meeting the benchmark.Justify creating a quality improvement initiative: Justify the creation of a quality improvement initiative using the dashboard and NPSG standards if ABC is not meeting the benchmark (you don’t need to create the quality improvement initiative, rather you need to justify the need for one to meet the benchmark if it is not being met).Guidelines for SubmissionSubmit this assignment as a 2 page Microsoft Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.Citations2021 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (Camh Hard Copy). (2020). [E-book]. JCR Publishing. https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/MainContent.aspxCriteria    Exemplary (100%)    Proficient (90%)    Needs Improvement (70%)    Not Evident (0%)    ValueInsights from Dashboard    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDescribes how data in the dashboard could be used by ABC Residential Center to find insights related to their operations or quality of careShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion15Dashboard Techniques    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDiscusses visualization techniques used by the dashboard to provide a quick, visual way to understand the data presented and any additional techniques recommended for the dashboard to use to make the data easier and quicker to understandShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10Determining Benchmarks    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDetermines benchmark for patient identification for ABCShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10Defend Selection    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageProvides rationale for selection of benchmarkShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10Meeting Benchmark    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageAnalyzes data in the dashboard to determine if ABC is meeting benchmarkShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion10Implications    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageDiscusses implications of not meeting benchmarkShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion15Justify Creating Quality Improvement Initiative    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful manner, using industry-specific languageJustifies creation of quality improvement initiative using dashboard and NPSG standards if ABC is not meeting benchmarkShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissionsDoes not attempt criterion15Articulation of Responses    Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear and insightful mannerClearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purposeShows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources    Incorporates more than two scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or use of sources is exceptionally insightfulIncorporates two scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources that support claimsIncorporates fewer than two scholarly, current (within the last five years) sources, or not all sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources5APA Style    Formats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with no errorsFormats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with fewer than five errorsFormats in-text citations and reference list according to APA style with five or more errorsDoes not format in-text citations and reference list according to APA style5Total:    100%Module Three Short Paper Rubric