Explain your proposed research topic, discuss your problem statement, research questions and/or hypothesis, the population you expect to survey

Explain your proposed research topic, discuss your problem statement, research questions and/or hypothesis, the population you expect to survey (preliminary design/methodology), and how this problem relates to urban higher education. Include at least 5 refereed references (preliminary literature review) that support the need to address your research topic (2500 words, font size 12).

Briefly: (a) state your research problem, (b) explain its significance to urban higher education and (c) state your proposed dissertation topic in 13 words or less.

-Research Problem: Students with disabilities not attending IHLs and their reasoning.
-Significance: There is an increase of students with disabilities who either choose not to further their education at an IHL or they attend and do not graduate.
-Proposed Dissertation Topic: Reasons African American students with disabilities don’t graduate or choose IHLs.

List any additional topics you are interested in as related to catalyst leadership in an urban or metropolitan setting as well as any particular areas of weaknesses you would like to study in more depth.
-The number of students with disabilities who completes college AND obtain a job in his/her degree area.
-The restraints that students with disabilities encounter in higher education.

Briefly: (a) state your research problem, (b) explain its significance to urban higher education and (c) state your proposed dissertation topic in 13 words or less.

-Research Problem: Students with disabilities not attending IHLs and their reasoning.

-Significance: There is an increase of students with disabilities who either choose not to further their education at an IHL or they attend and do not graduate.

-Proposed Dissertation Topic: Reasons African American students with disabilities don’t graduate or choose IHLs.
[supanova_question]

The “Blue Wall of Silence” and Police Culture it’s relevance to police ethics

Be thinking about identifying the major talking points about your topic that are important to review. Critically assess the literature on the subject. I am looking for critical thinking and a clear indication that you have a grasp of the literature.Do not include quotes in your work. I want to see your critical thinking skills on display and not a string of quotes written by published authors. Your analysis is what is needed for a successful paper. In other words, the peer-reviewed sources used in the paper should be paraphrased, cited in proper APA format and reflect critical thinking.At this point in your educational journey, you should have solid substance and proper academic formatting in your college-level writing assignments. Students will be graded on both so make sure you turn in your best work.Do not wait until the last minute to research, write, format, and edit. Proper time management is required to turn in a quality paper that highlights your criminal justice writing.Each student will be required to complete the term project, which is an 8-12 page APA Style paper. Your paper should have at least 8-12 pages of substance not counting the cover and reference pages. Please be sure that your paper is a Word Document (.doc) uploaded to the assignment section as an attachment. Students will be required to use at least three scholarly – (peer-reviewed)- sources. Students have access to peer-reviewed sources through the APUS library.  Criminal Justice Formal Written Paper Rubric Quality of ResponseNo ResponsePoor/UnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodExcellentContent (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper.20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete.50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing.  Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 7th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.  10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 7th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 7th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 7th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper.5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization;  and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.  20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization;  and the essay is error free.  Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper.3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 7th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 7th edition requirements whatsoever.  5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 7th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform with size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.three scholarly – (peer-reviewed)- sources.[supanova_question]

Boost the immune function and why?

My topic is foods that boost the immune function and why? Doesn’t have a requirement on amount of references but definitely do a few. Sources can be any reliable science based site like Google scholar for example. The files I attached are some sources that seemed good to me if you would like to use them.[supanova_question]

Any topic (writer’s choice)

Writing Assignment Help Please review the Assignment’s Grading Rubric to know how your assignment will be graded.  There is also instructions on how to format your letter above  on your Cougar Course Shell.  To help you, you can find your Representative and State Nursing Legislative Agendas below. https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.ANA’s Policy [supanova_question]

Compare/Contrast Problem Solving, Critical Thinking and Using Logic – Combinatorics as Problem-Solving Exercises

Question 1
The Learning Activity titled “Applying Polya’s Four Steps” presents the central problem about Speedy Shuttle Solutions at the beginning of the section. How does the given information in the problem answer the specific questions asked in the Step 2 Explanation? If the problem were changed to read “…What is the profit from one day’s operation…,” what details of the “plan” would need to change and in what way?
Question 2
Refer back to the Learning Activities titled “A Formula for Permutations” and “A Formula for Combinations.” Explain how the Fundamental Counting Principle is used each time the Permutation Formula (nPr) or the Combination Formula (nCr) is applied. Would these be considered independent or dependent events? Or, is it inappropriate to be concerned about whether it is independent/dependent? Explain your thinking on the question.
[supanova_question]

CH 8 – The Collaborative Process in the book

Make sure to take notes on all reading detailed
1. What are the Key Topics? Write a one sentence summary of each topic.
2. How do the visual examples illuminate/help to illustrate the ideas?
3. What are the key terms? Write definitions of all the terms new to you then check your understanding in the glossary or online.
4. How do the designer’s notes (quotations) illuminate the topics? Look up the people quoted – who are/were they and what do/did they do?
5. How do the case studies illuminate the topics?
6. Who are the designers and directors in the case studies? What’s interesting about them?
7. Who are the key figures in this chapter (theatre artists, designers, etc.) and what’s their contribution to the field?
8. What are the plays or productions mentioned and why?
9. Anything else interesting about this reading?
[supanova_question]